Which of the Following Are Examples of Natural Monopolies?

A natural monopoly is a firm that has a market share of 100%, meaning it is the exclusive provider of a good or service in a particular geographical area. There are several factors that can give a firm a natural monopoly, including economies of scale, network effects, and legal or governmental barriers to entry.

• Economies of scale: A firm with economies of scale can produce a good or service at lower cost than any other firm for any given level of output. This means that the marginal cost of producing one additional unit approaches zero. As a result, no other firm can compete with the monopolist, making it a natural monopoly.
• Network effects: A firm with network effects creates a product or service that becomes more valuable as more people use it. For example, the more people who use a telephone network, the more valuable it is to each person on the network because it allows them to communicate with more people. Natural monopolies can exist in network industries where the monopolist has a large customer base and a network that is difficult to replicate, creating a sustainable competitive advantage.
• Legal or governmental barriers to entry: Government actions, regulations, or policies that give a firm the exclusive right to produce or provide a good or service within a specific geographical area can create natural monopolies. Examples include government-issued patents, licenses, and franchises, as well as regulations that create high barriers to entry. Legal barriers make it very difficult for other firms to enter the market and compete with the monopolist, which protects the monopolist’s dominance.

  These days most economists have come to realize that natural monopolies are the exception, not the rule. There are few markets of significance in which it would be more efficient for one firm to offer all output because economies of scale are so limited.

  For a brief moment, IBM had a natural monopoly on large computing systems, but that broke down with the emergence of competitors like Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) and Hewlett-Packard (HP). Supermarkets have economies of scale that have made local stores all but obsolete; now Amazon offers an even more immense economy of scale because of internet shopping. At one time, Xerox had close to a 100% of the copier market. Now customers can pick from Canon, Ricoh, Toshiba, Sharp, and HP. In short, that sphere where natural monopolies can flourish is shrinking, not growing.

The natural advantages Microsoft and Facebook both acquired were due to network effects. Because of Metcalfe’s Law, the value of a network approximately doubles every time a new member is added, so having a large number of users in the first place is worth a great deal – even more than being the relatively lower-cost producer. Therefore it was very difficult for other word processing programs to challenge Microsoft when Microsoft Word was bundled with every new personal computer for years.

Smartphones have actually replaced many natural monopolies made possible by network effects. For decades, telephone companies, mail carriers, and financial institutions had legal and technological advantages that tamped down competition but that have been declining in recent years. Customers almost always pay less when a variety of companies can provide the desired service or product and the newest, most efficient entity usually winds up doing so, giving customers the greatest value for the lowest cost.

Natural monopolies can have both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, they can lead to lower prices and increased efficiency. On the other hand, they can also lead to higher prices, reduced innovation, and less consumer choice.

One of the main advantages of natural monopolies is that they can lead to lower prices. This is because a natural monopoly is the only firm that can produce a good or service in a particular geographical area and thus does not have to compete with other firms. As a result, the monopolist can set prices below the level that would be possible if there were other firms in the market.

Another advantage of natural monopolies is that they can lead to increased efficiency. This is because a natural monopoly can produce a good or service at a lower cost than any other firm. This is due to the fact that the monopolist has economies of scale, network effects, or other advantages that make it more efficient than other firms.

However, there are also some disadvantages to natural monopolies. One of the main disadvantages is that they can lead to higher prices. This is because the monopolist has the power to set prices above the level that would be possible if there were other firms in the market. This abuse of market power elevates prices and can have severe economic consequences.

Another disadvantage of natural monopolies is that they can lead to reduced innovation. This is because the monopolist does not have to worry about competition from other firms and can thus afford to be less innovative. Reduced innovation stifles economic growth and lessens society’s technological advancements.

Finally, natural monopolies can also lead to less consumer choice. This is because the monopolist is the only firm that can sell the good or service in a particular geographical area and thus has no incentive to offer a variety of products or services.

Trends and Developments

There are a number of trends and developments that are affecting natural monopolies. One of the most important trends is the rise of the internet. The internet has made it possible for firms to compete with natural monopolies in new and innovative ways. For example, the internet has made it possible for new firms to enter the market for telecommunications services and challenge the traditional telephone companies.

Another important trend is the growing awareness of the dangers of natural monopolies. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to regulate natural monopolies and protect consumers. This movement has led to the passage of laws that have made it more difficult for natural monopolies to abuse their market power.

Image: www.bartleby.com

Tips

There are a number of things that consumers can do to protect themselves from the dangers of natural monopolies. One of the most important things that consumers can do is to be aware of the market power that natural monopolies have. Consumers should also be willing to switch to other firms if they are unhappy with the prices or services offered by a natural monopoly.

Another thing that consumers can do is to support laws that regulate natural monopolies and protect consumers. Finally, consumers should be willing to speak out against the abuses of market power by natural monopolies.

Which Of The Following Are Examples Of Natural Monopolies

Conclusion

Whether caused by economies of scale, network effects, or government action, natural monopolies question the principles of the free market, making these kinds of market structure one of the exceptions to the rule. Typically thought of as negative by economists, concerns about maximizing efficiency, innovation, and consumer choice are legitimate topics, as well as the potential value in network effects and standardization that lead to scale efficiencies. While it is important to remember that a natural monopoly can lead to a more efficient market, it is crucial not to forget about the government’s role to prevent the abuse of a dominant position in a certain sector.

Were you interested in what you read today?